If you hand off your novel to a loved one and you can’t help but notice their attention wandering, it might be more than their unfinished game of Wordle that’s getting in the way. You might have written a novel that’s more confusing than you think.
I’m going to round up a list of reasons you might be confusing your reader.
You might have thought of some of the first ones on the list before, but they’re still worth a gut check, sort of a “did you try turning it off and turning it back on” level of writing advice.
But stick with me here, because I’m going to get to some you might not have thought of before.
You’ve lost sight of what’s actually on the page
This one is basic and fundamental. As writers, it’s nearly impossible to avoid projecting things onto the page that just aren’t there. Really ask yourself: Can I see what is and isn’t on the page?
You know what settings look like, why characters are doing what they’re doing, and why there’s a gargoyle playing pickleball atop every gate in your novel. Unless those details are actually on the page, the reader is going to be confused.
Every single writer struggles with this to some degree, which is why editing is so important, but some writers struggle more than others to put themselves in the shoes of someone who’s coming to their work fresh. Unless you can build that empathy muscle for your future readers, chances are you’re going to end up with a book that readers find a bit mystifying.
The perspective is broken
A novel’s perspective is absolutely fundamental to the reading experience. It helps determine where the reader situates their consciousness within the scene they’re constructing in their head.
If the perspective is omniscient, we’re anchored to an all-seeing “guide” who steers us around a scene. If it’s limited or first person, we’re tied very closely to a particular character.
We contextualize what happens in the scene with that vantage point in mind. For instance, if a first person narrative voice refers to a “he” within a scene, we know the narrator is referring to the man he’s talking to. If the perspective is unclear, we may be confused which character the “he” pronoun refers to.
When the perspective is a mishmash, we will quickly struggle to make sense of things and will feel extremely disoriented. Make sure you know your perspective, and keep it utterly consistent.
Your writing is imprecise or needlessly convoluted
The more energy the reader has to spend parsing sentences, the less they’re able to simply focus on the story.
Now, let me be clear that I’m not saying every single sentence needs to be as taut and spare as Hemingway. It’s okay to be flowery and interesting if you want to. But unless you’re explicitly aiming to create something challenging or experimental, err on the side of precise, elegant, and digestible.
Sharpen your physical description and make sure readers can visualize their surroundings, don’t bog things down with needless details about everyday objects, clear out the clutter around your verbs, and read your prose out loud to catch convoluted phrasing.
Precision is everything.
You’re trying too hard to be mysterious
Sure. We all love a good mystery. And sometimes authors are so worried they’re being boring they try to make every single micro-moment in their novel mysterious.
When they do this, they can easily cross a line where it stops being mysterious, and instead it’s just annoyingly vague. It’s exhausting to try to follow a story where a character is running around doing confusing things for confusing reasons. You’ll wear the reader out if they’re left to only grasp at what is happening entirely from scant clues.
Make sure the reader is well-situated in the story, choose your mysteries very judiciously, and try to build mysteries around whether characters will succeed or fail. It’s hard to feel anticipation for an impending encounter if we have no idea why the dragon they want to slay is important in the first place.
The motivations and stakes are unclear
This one might surprise you, but it’s absolutely crucial. Hear me out.
When you read a good novel, chances are you don’t process every single word of a novel equally. You prioritize what you latch onto. You sort the information into “important” and “not as important.” You’ll probably remember a slap from page 10 all the way to the end of the novel, but you might not remember the specific ingredients in the soup the character made themselves afterwards.
The protagonist’s motivations and the stakes (what happens if they succeed or fail) are absolutely crucial, because they help us sort information into “important” and “unimportant” buckets.
Anything tied to the character’s motivations will be ascribed importance, and anything that feels secondary can be safely discarded. This is what helps us make sense of tens of thousands of words without needing to remember every single one.
For instance, let’s say a car cuts off the protagonist in traffic. If it’s just a random one-off interruption in the protagonist’s day, we’re probably not going to remember the precise color of the other car as the novel goes along. It doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of the story.
On the other hand, if the protagonist is actively searching for the person who wishes them wrong before they’re cut off in traffic, we’re much more likely to remember the details, because it’s tied much more closely to what the protagonist wants and more likely to be an important element later. We’re attuned to clues.
If the protagonist’s motivations and the stakes are buried off the page, we have no way to prioritize and filter, and every single detail feels equally important. We’ll struggle to hold it all in our heads and it’s very easy to feel overwhelmed.
You’re drowning the reader in irrelevant information
We’ve all had moments reading novels when our eyes start glazing over. We lose our connection to the story and ask ourselves, “Where is this going?”
Chances are the writer is giving us information that’s irrelevant to the main story. The narrative is on hold for an info-dump, or a static scene to deliver information That Will Become Important Later, or to simply “establish” a character or story element in a way that doesn’t advance the story.
As I articulated in the previous section, readers anchor very strongly to what’s motivating the protagonist in the present storyline. If you grind things to a halt and focus too strongly on the information you think you need to deliver instead of advancing the story, the reader may ascribe it to the “unimportant” bucket because it has nothing to do with what the protagonist supposedly cares about.
And then the reader might either skim ahead to the point when things get going again, or they’ll stop reading entirely
When was the last time you dropped out of a story because you were confused? What was the reason? Let me know in the comments!
Need help with your book? I’m available for manuscript edits, query critiques, and coaching!
For my best advice, check out my online classes, my guide to writing a novel and my guide to publishing a book.
And if you like this post: subscribe to my newsletter!
Art: Pleasure Garden with a Maze by Lodewijk Toeput
Eva says
Hi,
You asked for examples: I couldn’t continue reading ‘West Heart Kill’ – the p.o.v. changed frequently – just as I was getting into the story, I was pulled me out of it.
Thanks for your blog Nathan.
Eva
Michie says
A novel where the protagonist’s POV stays the same but story time traveled is “The Language of Flowers,” which came out in 2011. I fiinished reading this with some stops and starts because the flashbacks were relevant to the story but didn’t interest me. I would rather have had a linear narrative with the protagonist starting in the present and going forward with hints of what happened previously, then, after the full story was told, have the protagonist reveal the whys and therefores of her actions. I skipped some of the flashbacks because I got the gist. Maybe it was simply a style preference. My own manuscript has some flashbacks but they are short, not whole chapters. I would like to hear someone else’s opinion on this book.