• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Nathan Bransford | Writing, Book Editing, Publishing

Helping authors achieve their dreams

  • Blog
  • Writing Advice
  • Publishing Advice
  • About
  • Take a Class
  • Get Editing

Character and plot are inseparable

June 24, 2008 by Nathan Bransford 40 Comments

You may have the idea that you somehow have to choose between writing a plot-oriented novel and a character-oriented novel, and that one has to come at the expense of the other. I’m here to tell you why you don’t worry about these categories. It’s a completely false choice.

UPDATED 5/30/19

There’s no such thing as “character” or “plot” novels

Writers love to divide themselves into warring camps of competing ideals, and you can hear the tremendous outpouring of snootiness when this happens.

“Oh, I write character-based novels. I like my readers to actually get to know a real character instead of stuff just blowing up.”

“Oh, I write genre fiction, and I do so proudly. Stuff actually, ya know, happens in my books.”

See what these fictional people did? They separated themselves into “character” writers and “plot” writers. Annnnnd they’re both wrong. Plot and character are inseparable. 

Here’s why. 

Character is revealed through the plot

Let’s first look at what makes a compelling character. Here are some examples:

  • A character starts off seeming normal, but the events that follow reveal abilities and/or personality traits they never knew they had (Luke Skywalker, Harry Potter, Anastasia Steele, et al.).
  • A character battles internal demons, which places them at odds with their surroundings (Holden Caulfield, Hamlet, Quentin Compson, Anastasia Steele, et al.).
  • A relatively normal person observes a crazy world around them (Ishmael, Nick Carraway, Arthur Dent, Anastasia Steele, et al.).

There are many more, and sometimes these different character archetypes are mixed up and combined. But what do they have in common? Stuff happens to them. They do stuff. Things get complicated. And at the heart of every compelling character who has walked the pages of a novel is one thing: conflict.

Or rather, three things: conflict, more conflict, and still more conflict. 

How is that most-interesting character’s personality revealed? Through the plot! What good is an interesting character if they aren’t doing anything and if interesting things aren’t happening to them?

Characters make the plot interesting and vice versa

Character is what makes the plot interesting, because we’re learning more about the character based on how they react to the events. The plot tests a character and forces them to make choices, and the plot needs a compelling character for us to care about it.

If the character isn’t a different person at the end of the story than the beginning, well, that’s not very interesting. 

Plot needs character. Character needs plot. They’re two sides of the same coin. Focus on developing them both in tandem, and don’t neglect one at the expense of the other.

Need help with your book? I’m available for manuscript edits, query critiques, and coaching!

For my best advice, check out my online classes (NEW!), my guide to writing a novel and my guide to publishing a book.

And if you like this post: subscribe to my newsletter!

Art: Italian Comedians by Antoine Watteau

Filed Under: Writing Advice Tagged With: Harry Potter, Hemingway, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, How to Write a Novel, J.D. Salinger, Moby-Dick, Shakespeare, Star Wars, writing advice

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kristan says

    June 24, 2008 at 5:59 pm

    LOL. Another great post, both humorous and informative.

    Hey, wanna write my book for me?! I may be able to work something out with Costa Rica…

    Reply
  2. Anne Dayton says

    June 24, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    I feel smarter after reading this post.

    Reply
  3. wolf says

    June 24, 2008 at 6:33 pm

    So do antagonists (vs. protagonists) fit into these archetypes too, do you think? Or do they follow a different set of rules? I think I’ve read a few books where the antagonist was more interesting than the MC.

    Reply
  4. Luc2 says

    June 24, 2008 at 7:01 pm

    Man, you really hit your stride here, Nathan. Your latest posts have been excellent. Stay in the zone!

    Reply
  5. pjd says

    June 24, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    This is a terrific articulation of what a few commenters were commenting about in the previous posts’ comments.

    My one quibble is that your example of an uninteresting character involved paying taxes. Maybe the IRS should look into your records because the only way you could think paying taxes doesn’t involve conflict is if you’ve never paid them.

    Seriously, “different side of the same coin” is the key here. Plot, character, conflict–they all are important ingredients. That’s what I meant when I said I don’t begin writing without knowing that I have a decent plot ahead of me (which may change as I go but which is at least somewhat put together). You can’t have a decent plot without understanding the characters and their motivations and the conflict.

    Reply
  6. Margaret Yang says

    June 24, 2008 at 7:24 pm

    So…character plus conflict equals plot. Got it.

    Must be the one gallon of coffee I consumed today. 🙂

    There has been some discussion of this over at Query Shark. Miss Shark complains about queries that are simply “a list of events, not a plot.” There is a difference, although sometimes it is hard to make sure your query contains the latter, not the former.

    Reply
  7. Avrinell says

    June 24, 2008 at 7:24 pm

    my comment leans more toward wolfs post. Not that you can’t contradict me in any way that you wish nathan :). I think that its possible for stories to have multiple plots. Not just one for the so called main character but for the villian(s) as well. They are their own characters in the story as well, whether the author wants you to love then or hate them.
    They too have the ability to grow and develop in the same way that the MC or good guy does.
    Take Terry goodkind (fantasy) for example. His books thrives off of villianous characters that each has there own internal struggle. Different events in the story happen that thus affect them and change who they are. The biggist being a woman by the name of Nicci (not the MC). Goodkind flawlesly injects her own story in the the book (hence a differnt plot) and she goes from being the bad guy to a good guy. The change that nathan speaks about.
    I think too that its possible that one really good plot can affect both the pro and the antagonist in the same way. We all have to remember that people can both see the same thing happen but interpret it in their own way, thus effecting them differently.
    And if we like one more than another…its how we as individuals interpret something..at least we like something or someone in the book right!

    Reply
  8. JES says

    June 24, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    pjd: You can’t have a decent plot without understanding the characters and their motivations and the conflict.

    Well said.

    Not to make this all, y’know, deep and elitist, but in some ways the whole plot/character discussion is Aristotelian; it requires believing — at least temporarily — that they’re two distinct phenomena.

    Interestingly (or not :), I can conceive of a book in which a character does absolutely nothing. (Nicholson Baker’s early novels were kinda like that.) But I cannot think of a book with a plot but no characters. Which makes me kind of think it’s all about the people first.

    Hmm. Time for a poll!

    Reply
  9. Corked Wine and Cigarettes says

    June 24, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    Whew! Thank God all my plots are derivative. To think people out there are risking everything with untested plotlines. Preposterous!

    Reply
  10. Melanie Avila says

    June 24, 2008 at 8:05 pm

    Great post, Nathan. Thanks for breaking this down for us.

    Reply
  11. sex scenes at starbucks says

    June 24, 2008 at 8:31 pm

    I usually come up with a situation first–a propelling event in some world. Then I people the event. Then I plot it. It wasn’t always this way for me, but it’s how I do it now via character scripts and synopses. I’ve learned never to start a story or book without knowing the end.

    But generally, especially as a spec-fic writer, I try to rest my stories on the three-legged stool of character, plot, and setting.

    Good post, Nathan.

    Reply
  12. Anonymous says

    June 24, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    I balked a little at your two sides of the coin analogy. I prefer Stephen King’s concept that plot is the character’s footprints in the snow.

    I first find a character and they develop the plot. Doing it the other way around is like when you read that so and so was considered for a particular movie part. My usual response is, “But X IS that character. There’s no way so and so could ever have filled those shoes.”

    The point being that having an exiting plot with twists, turns and surprises isn’t worth much without the great actor to fill the lead role.

    Give me characters and the rest will take care of itself.

    Reply
  13. Adaora A. says

    June 24, 2008 at 9:02 pm

    You could have made a brilliant English teacher Nathan. Seriously, you’ve laid it all out better then the folks I had in high school (er…three almost four years ago).

    I CAN’T believe you chickened out! I figured you were swamped with the Monday morning query rush or something. Those folks that query you over the weekend and leave you drinking the ‘every man’ drink, and chomping spicy Thai. Chin up, the worrying was all for nothing, it was a brilliant post. I hope the Guatemala’s leader’s are prepared to offer you a vacation home.

    Reply
  14. Adaora A. says

    June 24, 2008 at 10:00 pm

    Maybe – for folks who google your name and don’t read on a daily basis – you should add this to THE ESSENTIALS?

    Just a thought.

    Reply
  15. Conduit says

    June 24, 2008 at 10:17 pm

    I’d like to just chip in with a further reading recommendation: Anyone who’s interested in how the interweaving of character, plot, conflict, desire, counter-desire, protagonist, anatgonist – all that good why-didn’t-I-see-that-before stuff – could do a lot worse than read STORY by Robert McKee. It’s a great break down of how storytelling works. It’s not about rules or restrictions, but rather mechanics. Even if you think it’s all over-intellectualised bumph, it’s still an enlightening and thought-provoking read.

    Reply
  16. Julie Weathers says

    June 24, 2008 at 10:49 pm

    I’ve been sitting here thinking about this and how I come up with ideas.

    Suspense novel spun off the lines, “A child is born into this world with only two fears, loud noises and a fear of falling. Children of abuse quickly learn every other fear.” That got me to thinking about how this child would react to things as an adult. Toss in a news story about killing horses and voila, suspense novel. It had to start with an interesting character, though.

    I think all of my stories start with an intriguing person and then disaster strikes. They aren’t very interesting without the disaster, so I agree with Nathan. It’s very much a partnership.

    Stuart, I’m going to add that book to my wish list. That’s the third time I’ve heard about it recently, so I’m taking that as a sign.

    Reply
  17. Anonymous says

    June 24, 2008 at 11:49 pm

    This is my problem. My characters knock on the door, there is no answer, so they walk away.

    Reply
  18. Anonymous says

    June 25, 2008 at 12:26 am

    What (help me here) is the basic problem of a teenager?
    Too much energy?
    so how do they solve that?
    or Individuation?
    and how do they solve that?

    Reply
  19. Lupina says

    June 25, 2008 at 12:54 am

    Nathan, it was worth the wait. You’ve put it very well. This is one I’ll want to print and stick in my notebook for frequent nibbling.

    It sometimes is SO hard to keep making the character choose and act, rather than be chosen and acted upon, but I do believe therein lies the diff between novelular (how’s that for weird coinage?) indifference or success.

    Thanks, and try some chocolate with that coffee.

    Reply
  20. Heather Harper says

    June 25, 2008 at 1:15 am

    I printed the last post and I’m printing this one, too.

    Thank you for sharing, Nathan.

    Reply
  21. Marilynn Byerly says

    June 25, 2008 at 1:20 am

    Ben Bova in his THE CRAFT OF WRITING SCIENCE FICTION THAT SELLS says much the same thing.

    The most important thing Bova explains is how character and plot interact with each other, and how character creates plot. (Plot as a characterization device.) He believes that the writer must examine her character and find his one glaring weakness and attack it through plot.

    The protagonist should have a complex set of emotional problems where two opposing feelings are struggling with each other–Emotion A vs. Emotion B. (guilt vs. duty, pride vs. obedience, fear vs. responsibility, etc.)

    This conflict should exist on many levels. In other words, the character’s emotional struggle should be mirrored in the action of the novel.

    In STAR WARS, for example, Han Solo’s cynical selfishness wars with his unselfish love for idealistic Luke. Han’s ready to leave with his loot when the Alliance attacks the Death Star, but risks everything to save Luke. That emotional conflict is mirrored in the struggle between the two political factions as well as in the thematic two sides of the movie–the good and dark sides of the Force.

    Bova’s ideas have proven useful to me, not only in creating my novels, but also as an aid when I’m stuck during a novel. When I can’t decide where I’m going or have terminal writer’s block, I reexamine my main characters’ Emotion A vs. B and realize where I’ve made a plot error so I’m able to start again in the right direction.

    I go into considerably more detail about this method in my article on creating a novel with index cards.
    https://marilynnbyerly.com/marilynnbyerly/page9a.html

    Reply
  22. sruble says

    June 25, 2008 at 3:00 am

    Thanks for both plot posts Nathan – you rock!
    Stephanie

    Reply
  23. Dan says

    June 25, 2008 at 4:41 am

    Does Holden Caulfield really change (or do I need to go back and reread the book?)

    Reply
  24. Whirlochre says

    June 25, 2008 at 6:32 am

    Primarily it’s about what the characters believe about themselves and the world.

    These beliefs are what they act upon (can’t help themselves).

    Their actions result in change, both for themselves and for their world.

    So — I always start with character, and if events (the world) take a turn for the worse, what matters is how the characters react and what they do. I’ve tried laying masterplan plots over characters like some sort of grid, but it’s never worked. The justifiably unexpected plot twists become opportunities for potential readers to cry out in despair, “No! No! He/she wouldn’t do that!”

    Reply
  25. Kate Lord Brown says

    June 25, 2008 at 7:55 am

    Couldn’t agree more. Personally I always start with character – but crucially they are always at a dramatic point in their lives. I think it was Stephen King who said during the first draft you are telling yourself the story. The second draft is all about taking out everything that is not the story – making the plot clearer, the characters better defined.

    Reply
  26. jwhit says

    June 25, 2008 at 9:56 am

    Kate, I’m with you — being a pantser I *love* how the characters tell *me* the story. My theory is that the responses are more natural as they encounter the events. My ‘fear’ is that if I plan it too tightly, the effect will be stilted, unnatural, artificial.

    BUT there must be characters, human or otherwise, some sensient being to feel and act, plus events that elicit those feelings and actions, either in the world or with other people in the world. Flaws help.

    Reply
  27. Betty Atkins Dominguez says

    June 25, 2008 at 11:31 am

    Fantastic, Nathan! You just proved you are a great agent… One of these days, you’ll be publishing a book for writers.

    Reply
  28. The Wannabe Scribe says

    June 25, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    Excellent post Nathan.

    I believe the character and the plot are more than inseparable. I was going to say the are almost one and the same, but that’s just not true. However they should be treated by the author as one and the same.

    One character will react to the plot differently to another character, based on that character’s abilities and beliefs. It’s how they react that make them interesting.

    If the character is quirky and nothing happens, then they have nothing to be quirky about, but give them something big to react to, and you have a whole lot of quirkiness all over your page. That makes for interesting reading.

    Although, we all have our different methods, and each writer will achieve their ends via their own path, let’s not forget that our characters live in the plot – the plot is their world.

    Reply
  29. Pema says

    June 25, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    Thank you. I had heard this advice somewhere before, but your most helped remind me and refresh my memory on what is important in a character.

    Reply
  30. Bethany says

    June 25, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    Great post! I actually felt the need to post on this topic myself at my blog. bethanyhensel.blogspot.com.

    Good job, Nathan. If we ever do another interview together, I know exactly what kind of questions I’ll ask you! 😉

    Bethany
    bethanyhensel.blogspot.com
    A Blog Celebrating Arts and Entertainment

    Reply
  31. Kristin Laughtin says

    June 25, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    I’m one of those people who tends to come up with characters first, and while I do plot and plot and plot to figure out the character’s journey and keep them from just standing there, I’ve been having trouble doing that with one of the upcoming stories I want to write.

    And most importantly, the plot changes the character along the way. Every compelling character starts in one place and ends up in a different place, and how they get from point A and point B is the plot.
    Thanks for this! This has totally just inspired me–I had a point A and point B for this character, and knew her internal conflicts, but this simple statement has just helped me figure out some of the stuff that’s going to happen between the opening and closing of the door. Amazing.

    Reply
  32. nymeria87 says

    June 25, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    Great post and I hope you don’t mind me linking to this on my own blog at http://www.nymeria87.wordpress.com

    Anyway, I guess it should be pretty self-evident that character and plot are inseparable, just like you said you need some kind of conflict and some way for it to unfold. I’m thinking that most of us – myself included – who prefer the character-based approach in writing, rather unconsciously develop character and plot together without even noticing it. After all it goes hand in hand and plot is what makes a compelling character and the other way ’round.

    Thanks again for another excellent definition post 😀

    Reply
  33. Sam says

    June 25, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    Or, as Henry James put it – with uncharacteristic succinctness – ‘Character is plot’.

    Reply
  34. Anonymous says

    June 26, 2008 at 9:26 pm

    Ha! I’m late to the party, but I came prepared with a great Henry James quote. I read all the way through the comments to make sure I wasn’t being redundant, and the very last post had it! Well, it’s a good quote, and I’ve got the actual lines, so I’ll post it anyway. From “The Art of Fiction”:

    “What is character but the determination of incident? What is incident but the illustration of character?”

    It’s sort of like, “You are what you eat,” but for fiction, “You are are what you do.”

    Reply
  35. Sam says

    June 27, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    Sorry, anon! I prefer your fuller version, though.

    Sam

    Reply
  36. heather simmons says

    July 10, 2008 at 8:47 pm

    Nathan,

    This is where I get a anxious and want to snack on little blue pills. I can answer yes to everything you brought up as far as character and plot development but getting someone to crack it open to find out is the difficult part. Granted, I’ve only waited one week since sending out queries but I guess it’s because I keep telling myself that if the query was good enough, I would have heard it by now. This is not meant to say that I don’t realize how busy agents are, because I can only imagine. It speaks more to my patience and insecurities. I guess my question is, when do I start worrying? Will I at least hear ‘you suck?’ (if I do?) Have you ever passed up a weak query and found out later that the book was great? (Ok, three questions)

    Reply
  37. Anonymous says

    September 25, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    I don't mean to say you're not a fantastic agent and you do give wonderful insight into the whole publishing process, but MAN! your posts on the craft of writing…FANTASTIC! Thanks for all your hard work Nathan.

    Reply
  38. Joseph Pedulla says

    January 8, 2016 at 3:28 pm

    Great post! Yes. Character is plot. You explain this very well. Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

About Nathan

Hi, I’m Nathan. I’m the author of How to Write a Novel and the Jacob Wonderbar series, which was published by Penguin. I used to be a literary agent at Curtis Brown Ltd. and I’m dedicated to helping authors achieve their dreams. Let me help you with your book!

My blog has everything you need to know to write, edit, and publish a book. Can’t find what you need or want personalized help? Reach out.

Learn more about me

Need Editing?

I'm available for consultations, edits, query critiques, brainstorming, and more.
Learn more!

My Books

How to Write A Novel
Cover of How to Publish a Book by Nathan Bransford
Jacob Wonderbar and the Cosmic Space Kapo
Jacob Wonderbar for President of the Universe
Jacob Wonderbar and the Interstellar Time Warp

Forums

Need help with your query? Want to talk books? Check out the Nathan Bransford Forums
Footer Logo
Nathan Bransford

Helping authors achieve their dreams

  • Editing Services
  • My Books
  • About Me
  • Blog Directory
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Twitter Logo Facebook Logo Instagram Logo
As an Amazon and Bookshop Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Amazon and Bookshop links are usually affiliate links.